## An era of assessing process alongside results ### Reading Discussions Become a Newsletter Hallym University Media School Colloquium · 2026.06.10 Reading discussions become a newsletter **Writing becomes media: designing major courses in the AI era** Presented by · **Achmage (안창현)** (Achmage) Source · [Slide 1](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#1) Today's question In the AI era, what are we being assessed on? **The process behind the outcome — and where that process is recorded.** Source · [Slide 2](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#2) Introduction Even a reporter with 20 years of experience struggled with the AI exam SK AX AI Competency Certification — KBS News 9 (2026.06.01) Source · [Slide 3](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#3) Introduction ### SK's AI competency certification exam appeared on the nine o'clock news ![ KBS News 9 report on the SK AX AI competency exam ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893345102-ac96d290-a355-4366-9032-c55e956b1fc9.png) **KBS News 9** (2026.06.01) · The AI exam shaping recruitment and promotion: we took it ourselves Source · [Slide 4](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#4) Introduction ### Nine years of experience: A; twenty years: B — even experienced KBS reporters struggled #### Reporter Bang Jun-won * **Joined KBS in 2018 (45th intake) · nine years of experience:** A ![ Reporter Bang Jun-won: scene 1 ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893407267-5c29c757-4833-4223-80a0-b3f37129e034.png) ![ Reporter Bang Jun-won: scene 2 ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893418508-4de1a89d-1a4a-4749-bd15-1d495f819619.png) #### Reporter Kim Jun-beom * **Joined KBS in 2007 (33rd intake) · twenty years of experience:** B ![ Reporter Kim Jun-beom: scene 1 ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893427568-939a2f67-020e-424a-b277-9f4181bd523f.png) ![ Reporter Kim Jun-beom: scene 2 ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893437188-0dcc3de6-ccd1-4cc4-9d78-48a2ae71f5a4.png) ≠ **The highest grade is S** · Sources: KBS News 9 (2026.06.01); NamuWiki, KBS NEWS staff Source · [Slide 5](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#5) Introduction ### Two exam stages: literacy, then bootcamp STEP 1 · AI literacy * **From understanding generative AI to prompting and everyday applications: assessing literacy and execution in real work contexts.** STEP 2 · AI bootcamp **Practice building RAG systems and AI web/apps, then design and develop an AI agent and receive certification through a technical assessment.** ![ SK AX AI exam report ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893444370-8f4a7905-180e-415b-abf3-53a510fbcea7.png) AI use: **the process** itself is assessed — KBS / SK AX Source · [Slide 6](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#6) Introduction > You can solve it without knowing how to code. > The assessment focuses on how well you > structure the problem and approach it > step by step. > > — Yoon Seong-hwan, SK AX AI testing business team lead (translated quotation) ![ Interview with SK AX team lead Yoon Seong-hwan ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893450338-9d881dcb-b114-4785-9db6-1cfd37a30697.png) **The exam examines the problem-solving process, not just the answer.** Source · [Slide 7](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#7) In one sentence Companies have begun assessing the process of using AI alongside the finished result. Source · [Slide 8](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#8) Introduction ### New broadcast producers may soon face the same: three abilities assessed together ![ AI vibe-coding exam for non-developers: opencode screen and non-developer exam caption ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893460510-16382d1c-4082-43d7-b141-cac51f93e0d3.png) Even non-developers can solve problems through **vibe coding** — KBS News 9 01 #### Writing and planning **The ability to design relationships with readers.** 02 #### Structuring work with AI **Breaking a problem down and directing AI step by step.** 03 #### Executing through vibe coding **Demonstrating a dashboard or fact-checking app you have built.** Source · [Slide 9](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#9) Academia and research ## AI use and judgment in academic work Academia is already looking at the process Nature · Frontiers · Wiley surveys (2025–2026) Source · [Slide 10](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#10) Academia and research ### Of 4,946 researchers worldwide, only 1,043 had actually used AI in research 1,043 — had actually used AI in research (21%) **Even among reported uses, editing was 28% and drafting was below 8% (Nature survey, as of February 2025)** ![ Survey on experience writing papers with AI: only a minority had used it ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893270891-4fa19493-2500-4b47-9489-371d4048fd5d.png) Have you written a paper with AI? Most respondents **had not, or did not intend to** . Nature and Wiley surveys Sources: Wiley, worldwide researcher AI-use survey (2025.02.04) · Nature Source · [Slide 11](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#11) Academia and research ### For 66%, the barrier was not ability but a lack of training or guidance #### 44% needed AI training #### 22% did not know where to start **And most expected it to become commonplace in manuscripts, grants, and peer review soon.** ![ Chart forecasting acceptance of most AI uses within a few years ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893469603-8c78e296-80c9-41ad-880d-64da676323bc.webp) Most uses of AI were expected **to become accepted within a few years** — Nature Source · [Slide 12](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#12) Academia and research ### What is acceptable? Editing: 90%; translation: 91% ![ Chart of acceptance of AI editing ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893258219-04685540-8af3-403a-8aef-53cdd17fb1ae.png) **Editing** — human-written drafts refined by AI: 90% acceptance ![ Chart of acceptance of AI translation ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893261988-1d2fda8a-90d8-40de-8b6e-58a8789c0f08.png) **Translation** — AI used for a complete translation: 91% acceptance **However, 42% wanted even the translation prompts disclosed. Pressure to disclose the process has already begun.** Source: Nature survey (2025.05.14), around 5,000 respondents · Dr Bloggs scenario Source · [Slide 13](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#13) Academia and research ### Yet a majority said AI should never be used for Methods, Results, or Discussion ![ Chart of acceptance of AI use by paper section ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893266952-5c4f2987-e031-469b-b87e-1fc2d4987e35.png) The closer a section is to reporting results, **Never appropriate** the higher the rejection rate — Nature **Abstracts and introductions receive more tolerance. AI supports productivity; judgment remains human.** Source · [Slide 14](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#14) A key finding > People who had used AI > were more positive about its use. > > **“respondents’ self-reported experience with AI for writing or reviewing papers did correlate strongly with having favourable opinions of the scenarios.”** > > — Nature survey analysis (2025.05.14) **Attitudes differ through experience, beyond simple support or opposition — and experience accumulates through records.** Source · [Slide 15](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#15) Hao et al. 2026 (Nature) ### Papers that used AI as a tool were far ahead 3.02× #### Number of papers published 4.84× #### Citation count −1.37 years #### Time to promotion as a team leader Analysis of 41.29 million papers, 1980–2025 · Natural-science papers using AI as a tool · Hao et al., Nature (January 2026) Source · [Slide 16](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#16) A paradox Yet instead of opening new topics, AI encouraged already popular topics to be repeated. **Even new papers end up citing the first original: dissemination accelerates while thinking narrows.** Source · [Slide 17](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#17) The key point The question was not simply whether AI was used, but whether researchers had their own original data. Source · [Slide 18](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#18) Peer review ### A reversal in just seven months May 2025 · Nature #### 52% strongly opposed AI in peer review ![ Chart of opinions on AI in peer review ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893274846-c55afc04-a603-4d79-a388-69e7c71e0f05.webp) December 2025 · Frontiers 55% #### Already using AI in peer review (around 1,600 respondents worldwide) Seven months Source · [Slide 19](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#19) Frontiers 2025: overall recommendations ### Six academic recommendations, all pointing toward process 01 #### Transparency and responsibility Disclose when, where, and how AI was used 02 #### AI literacy education Structured education and accredited programs 03 #### Ethics and integrity Human accountability, bias testing, and reproducibility audits 04 #### Equity and access Ensure equitable access to AI skills 05 #### Community participation Develop policies together and establish feedback mechanisms 06 #### Policy leadership Contribute to global standards Source · [Slide 20](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#20) One recurring word Validate the process Teach the process Assess the process Source · [Slide 21](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#21) Then where do you store that process? **In a GPT chat? Context resets whenever you open a new conversation. In your head? You must reconstruct it from scratch whenever you need it.** Source · [Slide 22](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#22) Journalism education ## The human role that journalism demands Journalism education Where is it heading? ACEJMC · Columbia · USC · Columbia Journalism Review Source · [Slide 23](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#23) ACEJMC (US journalism accreditation) ### Core graduate competencies: the same four abilities Find Use appropriate tools to present **images and information** effectively Evaluate **Apply critical thinking** to research and evaluate information Verify Critically check accuracy, fairness, clarity, and **basic numerical and statistical information** in the work Express Write for the intended audience and purpose **accurately and clearly** Source · [Slide 24](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#24) Yet all these competencies depend on a habit of keeping records. Source · [Slide 25](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#25) Columbia Journalism School (CJS 2030) Learn. Build. Critique. **It emphasizes finding, collecting, and analyzing material, and explicitly calls on individuals to build their own digital archives.** Data journalism is a working environment that retains material, sources, analysis, and judgment, beyond one-off prompts. Source · [Slide 26](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#26) USC AIMS × Columbia Journalism Review Eighteen journalists were asked: How do you use AI? Source · [Slide 27](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#27) Journalists' accounts · 01 / 04 > AI is for productivity, > not for writing. > > **“As much as I believe that AI helps my productivity, I refuse to use it for writing.”** > > **— Emilia David · VentureBeat** Hand writing over to AI and you lose both your relationship with readers and the skill itself. Source · [Slide 28](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#28) Journalists' accounts · 02 / 04 > On its own, AI is > only a parlor trick. > > **“AI on its own is a parlor trick … useful when paired with properly structured data and someone who knows what they’re doing.”** > > **— Zach Seward, head of AI at The New York Times** **AI needs structured data and domain knowledge to work: the reason for personal knowledge management.** Source · [Slide 29](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#29) Journalists' accounts · 03 / 04 > Treat AI as hands, > not as a brain. > > **“I don’t fear AI if it’s used as a hand, not a brain.”** > > **— Susie Cagle** **The judging brain is human. Delegating it to AI may be faster, but becomes less human and less truthful.** Source · [Slide 30](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#30) Journalists' accounts · 04 / 04 > A smart assistant that can also produce nonsense: > I ask it to verify only after uploading my own draft and interview transcripts. > > **“I’ll upload sections of my book, along with interview transcripts … I would never ask it to write anything, though.”** > > **— Nicholas Thompson · The Atlantic, CEO** **AI begins to work when humans provide primary material and records.** Source · [Slide 31](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#31) A shared structure ### Journalists who use AI effectively follow the same pattern 01 · Human #### Create primary material * **Create original data through reporting, recording, and writing:** ▶ 02 · AI #### Assist * **Organize, verify, summarize, and translate (AI as hands):** ▶ 03 · Human #### Make final judgments and publish * **If AI is the only source, do not publish:** Ben Welsh(Reuters)·Sarah Cahlan(WaPo)·Khari Johnson(CalMatters) — CJR “How We’re Using AI”(2025.05.12) Source · [Slide 32](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#32) Conclusion The better journalists use AI, the more systematically they accumulate their own primary material. = PKM **Without structured personal knowledge, AI remains a parlor trick.** Source · [Slide 33](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#33) Northwestern University ## Repeatable action and records ### Agentic Investigation Challenge — an ongoing challenge at the time of the presentation ![ Northwestern Agentic Investigation Challenge: prize and schedule ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893277775-f95b81e1-506b-4433-99ed-ed75c0c21c27.png) $5,000 prize · Deadline July 15 · Judging August 15 — an AI-assisted investigative journalism competition **Submit more than a single AI-assisted story: submit the full record of how you used AI.** Source · [Slide 34](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#34) What to submit ### Four deliverables: documenting process alongside results ① #### Agent Skills Reusable AI workflow (directory) ② #### Findings (PDF) A findings report incorporating external material ③ #### Interaction Traces (JSON) Complete logs of inputs, tool calls, outputs, and interventions ④ #### README.md A Markdown index connecting the entire structure Source: Agentic AI Investigative Journalism Challenge, Northwestern (ongoing in June 2026) Source · [Slide 35](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#35) ① Agent Skills A repeatable procedure that produces the same result in nine out of ten runs **Knowledge assets that are structured and stored, beyond disposable prompts.** Source · [Slide 36](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#36) ③ Interaction Traces Inputs, tool calls, outputs, and the moments when I intervened to correct them: the complete logs. **A workflow that disappears when the chat closes cannot do this. A separate system for storing and managing records is needed.** Source · [Slide 37](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#37) The decisive point Without files, you cannot even submit. GPT web chat → traces disappear ✗ Local records (PKM) → ready to submit ✓ Source · [Slide 38](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#38) Records ## A structure for records that retain the process Ultimately, it comes back to records **To assess a process, that process must be retained somewhere.** Source · [Slide 39](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#39) Putting it together ### Three paths point to one destination Companies #### SK AX Assess the process of **structuring and solving problems** alongside outcomes Academia #### Nature · Frontiers Move beyond whether AI was used **toward disclosure of prompts and workflows** in practice Journalism #### Northwestern Require records and verification of **the entire reporting and working process** throughout the work One common thread: attention to process. Source · [Slide 40](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#40) The evolution of AI use ### Five stages of AI: from prompts to harnesses ![ Five stages of AI use: prompts → CoT → MCP → skills → harnesses ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893288713-dc1fdda6-dfab-4f74-86fd-7ef7fec3e499.png) **Prompts → CoT → MCP → Skills → Harnesses & AI OS** ![ The evolution from prompts to AI that knows me ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893280753-8035f578-ccc4-401f-b6df-426c9d0dcb2d.jpeg) Another account of the same trend: convergence on AI that knows me Source: The Better Newsletter, issue 220 Source · [Slide 41](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#41) National standard ### The national AI strategy committee adopted Markdown as a standard document format ![ National AI Strategy Committee press release adopting Markdown (2026-03-05) ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893338766-ec7befad-aed4-46fd-a79f-39a2b1ccc26a.png) National AI Strategy Committee press release (2026.03.05) **Markdown (.MD) A document format that uses simple symbols for headings, paragraphs, and contents instead of complex formatting, making it easy for both humans and AI to read.** **The stated concern is that extensive formatting in existing HWP documents makes their structure difficult for AI to recognize.** Source · [Slide 42](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#42) The form of a record ### The same file: clean to human eyes, broken for AI Human view (Hangul .hwp) ![ HWP document: clean to human eyes ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893341720-2b8b6130-85f1-41a9-92c6-644ab1d617bc.png) AI view (opened in a text editor) ![ The same file in a text editor: garbled text ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893351555-cd29f4c5-9947-4884-aa6d-a4ffe8ed99c8.png) \= Source · [Slide 43](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#43) The critical issue ### The issue is the form of the record, not simply whether one exists | Common objections | The underlying problem | | --- | --- | | But I organized everything in Hangul or Word. | A closed container: AI cannot read it | | But I wrote it in a notebook with a pen. | It cannot be searched, reproduced, or connected | | But it is all there when I log in to GPT. | Separate chat windows do not connect with one another | Having a record and having a record that AI can read are very different things. Source · [Slide 44](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#44) In the classroom: Odyssey Seminar 3, spring 2026 I interviewed 16 students. All said they used AI and kept records. Source · [Slide 45](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#45) Three shared findings from the interviews ### I know, but I do not act 01 #### Little more than temporary storage **Notebooks, text editors, and messages to oneself in KakaoTalk. Experience exists, but there is no process for converting it into knowledge.** 02 #### Existing only in one's head **There is plenty of observation and reporting, but the process is not retained: portfolios are reconstructed from memory.** 03 #### Awareness ≠ Action **Everyone agreed on the need. They simply did not know where or how to begin.** Source · [Slide 46](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#46) The key point Memory fades, but records accumulate: this is a question of design, not willpower. Source · [Slide 47](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#47) TL;DR · Markdown is all you need The problem is not a lack of records. The records are not in Markdown, so AI cannot read them. Source · [Slide 48](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#48) How to store it ## A workspace separating collection, understanding, and action How should .md files be stored? CMDS LLM Wiki · CMDS Vault · Achmage OS — a three-part architecture Source · [Slide 49](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#49) A three-part architecture ### The key is separating collection, understanding, and action Collection #### CMDS LLM Wiki * \*\*AI automatically collects quality material, reducing the effort of searching:\*\* understanding #### CMDS Vault * **Only what I have read, understood, and written myself (no AI):** Execution #### Achmage OS **A system that shortens and standardizes repeated production.** ![ Diagram of the three-part architecture ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893367854-28961d37-131b-450d-b742-fb8b2cd831f4.png) **Manage collection, understanding, and execution separately** Source · [Slide 50](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#50) What the three spaces do ### A place to collect, a place to understand, a place to create ![ Three vaults, explained simply ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893357139-a598c8d3-4170-4e2e-8524-a71611d457ab.png) **Three vaults, simply: store / collect / execute** ![ Understanding knowledge and executing work are different ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893376562-aa8a70de-f3b1-43c3-af27-a7bf5e3b13e0.png) * **Collection ≠ Understanding ≠ Execution: distinct roles** LLM Wiki collects; Vault supports understanding; Achmage OS produces. Source · [Slide 51](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#51) A daily workflow ### Collect material → Judge understanding → Accumulate knowledge → Act ![ Diagram of a daily workflow ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893388076-f7c4cef7-8025-4555-bf4e-38523113f188.png) **Separate collection, understanding, and execution to keep knowledge organized and AI execution stable** Source · [Slide 52](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#52) A student's personal newsroom ### Research desk · Editorial and reading notes · Production desk ![ Diagram of the student's personal newsroom analogy ](https://pub-acf6ad93f2ec4a5e8fa12e94d0c9b151.r2.dev/1791893397892-096bdf01-e3d0-40b8-8b97-7e213c68a6fe.png) **Spend the most time on editorial and reading notes (Vault)** #### LLM Wiki **Collect and supply material to the editor** #### Vault **Read, review, and digest: the largest time investment** #### Achmage OS **Less repetitive production, more attention to content** Source · [Slide 53](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#53) The key point Beyond tools, ask: What knowledge am I collecting, for what purpose, and why? Source · [Slide 54](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#54) Ten principles ## Ten principles for sustained reading and writing Beyond tools: principles of thinking Keeping records is a practice Ten commandments: principles for people who keep records Source · [Slide 55](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#55) Keeping records is a practice · 1–5 1 **Write even a single line** yourself: one line of my own over a thousand written by AI. 2 Even outside your main interests, **save what you read closely for more than ten seconds** . 3 Think in terms of **#hashtags** rather than folder classifications. 4 Prioritize the **density of notes over their number** — 2,400 AI notes < 24 notes I wrote myself. 5 Use your own words, clearly enough **to explain in ten seconds** in an elevator. Source · [Slide 56](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#56) Keeping records is a practice · 6–10 6 **There is no later** — take the note now and move it into Markdown. 7 Keeping records is **a habit** — like exercise, even three lines every day. 8 Explain to others: **share and teach** — that is how you become confident that you understand. 9 **Divide the work between AI and me** — AI collects and processes; I read, review, and analyze. 10 Note-taking is **a process toward note-making** — keep reading until a thought emerges. Source · [Slide 57](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#57) ### Reading Discussions Become a Newsletter Hallym University Media School Colloquium · 2026.06.10 Reading discussions become a newsletter Writing becomes media. Keeping records is a practice. **Presented by Achmage (안창현) · Thank you** Source · [Slide 58](https://achmage-slides.vercel.app/decks/media-colloquium-2026-06-10/index.html#58)